It’s time to reconsider The Little Engine That Could. For the extent of my lifetime, this book has been seen not only as a classic of children’s literature, but as a progenitor of the entire cursed self-help genre. All of which is fine and good… kids love it (e.g. TheHurricane, who now insists on reading it 8-10 times per day) and it certainly offers a helpful “think positive, and good things happen” attitude that many may find useful. But TheWife and I were discussing it over the weekend (on our way home from this year’s apple picking fiasco), and started considering it in an entirely new light:
The Little Engine That Could as proto-feminist diatribe.
Witness: the book begins with a chipper, “she”-identified red engine happily chugging along, bringing untold riches of toys and dolls and good food to the children who live on the other side of the mountain. Then, abruptly, she breaks down. The dolls and toys weep, in fear that they will not be delivered to the promised land.
Witness: a first train comes along – a shiny, golden “he”-identified engine – and the dolls and toys tearfully plead for help. But the shiny new engine refuses. He has just pulled a new passenger train over the mountain, and is far too bright, shiny, new and important to be bothered with the needs of women and children (and stuffed elephants and toy clowns). He tells them as much, and then steams off (he is wholly ego-powered, apparently) back to the roundhouse.
The shiny new engine is a young, self-important businessman, who believes his own glory and beauty are all that matter in the world, and who has no time or energy for compassion and feeling.
Witness: a second train arrives – a huge, powerful, black “big strong engine” – and the dolls and toys tearfully plead for help. “Please, please, strong engine. Pull us over the mountain so the good little boys and girls will have toys to play with and good food to eat.” He refuses. He has just pulled carloads of enormous machines over the mountain, machines that print books and newspapers for grown-ups to read. “I am a very important engine indeed” he huffs, “and I will not pull the likes of you.” And off he puffs indignantly (and yes, the author actually uses the word indignantly, which is a great choice for a children’s book) to the roundhouse.
The big strong engine is the working-class man — too lost in the importance of his own labors to be bothered with the needs of women (e.g. the initial red engine) and children.
Witness: a third train arrives – an old, rusty gray engine – and the dolls and toys tearfully plead their case. And again, it falls on deaf ears. (Perhaps literally.) “I am so old and tired,” he whines. “I can not. I can not. I can not.” And the tired old engine slowly makes his way back to the roundhouse.
The tired, old engine is the older man — broken after long years of labor, unable or unwilling to extend any effort to those he might be able to help.
Witness: a fourth train arrives – a small but beautiful blue train – and when the dolls and toys make their case, SHE agrees to try. “I’ve never been over the mountain,” she says, explaining that the military industrial complex has limited her to servile duties at the roundhouse. But she empathizes with the dolls and toys, and with the valiant, broken red engine, and with the children waiting on the other side of the mountain. So she hooks herself up to the cars and gives her all. “I think I can. I think I can. I think I can.”
And she succeeds. Her beauty – both as a train and as a compassionate, loving being – give her the strength to triumph over adversity and deliver her cargo to the promised land. And there is much rejoicing.
To summarize: males = egotistical, self-obsessed, unwilling to help those in need. Females = kind, giving, sensitive, and ultimately destined to triumph.
I couldn’t make this stuff up.

